High CourtsDivision Bench(1883) 05 CAL CK 0015

Chand Khan vs The Empress

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 28 May 1883 · Citation: (1883) ILR (Cal) 878

HON’BLE JUDGES
Prinsep, J · O''Kinealy, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 99 words

Prinsep, J.—We think that no appeal lies in this case. Section 406 provides expressly for an appeal on behalf of a person required by a Magistrate, other than the District Magistrate or a Presidency Magistrate, to give security for good behaviour, and the law nowhere declares that any appeal shall lie in other cases of this class. The order moreover is not a conviction on a trial held by a Sessions Judge (Section 410), nor a sentence of the District Magistrate subject to the confirmation of the Sessions Judge (Section 408a), and, therefore u/s 404 no appeal would lie.