High CourtsSingle Bench(1997) 06 J&K CK 0007

Chaman Lal Kana vs Virender Kana & Ors

Jammu And Kashmir High Court · Decided on 23 June 1997 · Citation: (1997) KashLJ 591

HON’BLE JUDGES
A.Q.Parray, J
CASE NUMBER
47 of 1989

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 228 words
1.

I have perused the records. The order impugned directing the framing of the issue ""Whether the suit of the plaintiff is hit by the principle of

resjudicata does not in any way determine the rights of the parties and the issue arises out of the pleadings of the parties 2. In order to bring the

principle of resjudicata, the party who pleads like that, has to prove that the matter was substantially in issue between the same parties or between

the parties through whom they are claiming and that the identity of the subject matter, out of which, adjudication has been made is also to be

established. This issue and other prelim/nary issues are to be gone through to prove it within the mischief resjudicata. 3 Merely pleading that the suit

is hit by doctrine of resjudicata will not be absolving the party who pleads like that. The order passed and impugned in this revision petition does

not in any way suffer on account of jurisd/ctional or procedural error which attracts provisions of Section 1 15 of Civil P.C. So the revision petition

is misconceived and is dismissed on merits. Let the suit file go to the trial court. Learned trial court shall proceed in the matter and adjudicate upon

the issue so framed in the impugned order. The revision file be consigned to records.

Srinagar I