Supreme CourtFull Bench(2011) 01 SC CK 0064

Centre, Public Interest Litigation and Another vs Union of India (UOI)

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 21 January 2011 · Citation: (2012) AIRSCW 547 : (2011) 2 SCALE 132

HON’BLE JUDGES
S. H. Kapadia, C.J · Swatanter Kumar, J · K. S. Panicker Radhakrishnan, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 180 of 2004 and 94 and 625 of 2005 and 47 of 2006 and 579 of 2009, S.L.P. (C) No. CC 9732 of 2007 and C.A. No''s. 323, 324, 325, 326, 327, 328, 329 and 330 of 2004 and 2429 and 2430 of 2005

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 271 words
1.

On oral application made by Mr. Prashant Bhushan, learned Counsel for the Petitioners, National Commission for Minorities and National Commission for Scheduled Castes are to be added as party Respondents since for following constitutional issues are arising:

[1] Whether Paragraph (3) of the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950 issued in exercise of Article 341(1) of the Constitution of India, which says that "Notwithstanding anything contained in paragraph 2, no person who professes a religion different from Hinduism, Sikhism and Buddhism shall be deemed to be a member of a Scheduled Caste" is unconstitutional and void, being violative of Articles 14, 15, 16 and 25 of the Constitution of India?

[2] Whether a Scheduled Caste professing a religion different from Hinduism, Sikhism and Buddhism can be deprived of the benefit of Paragraph 3 of the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950, in violation of Articles 14, 15, 16 and 25 of the Constitution of India? [3] Whether non-inclusion of "Christians" and "Muslims' in Paragraph (3) of the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950, along with Hinduism, Sikhism and Buddhism, is discriminatory and violative of Articles 14, 15, 16 and 25 of the Constitution of India?

2.

Let notice be issued to the newly added Respondents.

3.

Notice to newly added parties be served via Dasti.

4.

Since very important constitutional issues are arising in these cases, we request Shri T.R. Andhyarujina, learned senior counsel, to assist the Court as amicus. Copies of the Paper Books and other compilation in the main matter be given to Shri T.R. Andhyarujina.

5.

Place these matters for final disposal on 24th February, 2011, subject to over-night part-heard.