Supreme CourtFull Bench(2010) 07 SC CK 0142

Central Electricity Regulatory Commission vs National Hydroelectricity Power Corporation Ltd. and Others

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 26 July 2010 · Citation: (2011) 2 MhLj 50 : (2011) MPLJ 565 : (2010) 7 SCALE 485 : (2010) 10 SCC 280

HON’BLE JUDGES
S. H. Kapadia, C.J · Swatanter Kumar, J · K. S. Panicker Radhakrishnan, J
RESULT
dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal No. ... of 2010 (D.21216 of 2010) and Civil Appeal No. ... of 2010 (D.21576 of 2010)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 332 words
1.

In various Courts, the statistical data indicates that, on account of delay in process serving, arrears keep on mounting. In Delhi itself, the input indicates that fifty per cent of the arrears in Courts particularly in commercial cases is on account of delay in process serving.

2.

For the above reasons, the following directions, as mentioned herein below, are given:

[i] In addition to normal mode of service, service of Notice(s) may be effected by E-Mail for which the advocate(s) on-record will, at the time of filing of petition/appeal, furnish to the filing counter a soft copy of the entire petition/appeal in PDF format;

[ii] The advocate(s) on-record shall also simultaneously submit E-Mail addresses of the respondent(s) Companies/Corporation(s) to the filing counter of the Registry. This will be in addition to the hard copy of the petition/appeal;

[iii] If the Court issues notice, then, in that event alone, the Registry will send such an additional notice at the E-Mail addresses of the respondent(s) Companies/Corporation(s) via E-Mail;

[iv] The Registry will also send Notice at the E-Mail address of the advocate(s) for respondent(s) Companies/Corporation(s), who have filed caveat. Advocate(s) on-record filing caveat shall provide his/her E-Mail address for effecting service; and [v] Within two weeks from today, Cabinet Secretariat shall also provide centralized E-Mail addresses of various Ministries/Departments/ Regulatory Authorities along with the names of the Nodal Officers, if already appointed, for the purposes of service.

Clarification:

3.

The above facility is being extended in addition to the modes of service mentioned in the existing Supreme Court Rules. This facility, for the time being, is extended to commercial litigation and to those cases where the advocate(s) on-record seeks urgent interim reliefs.

4.

A copy of this Order be sent to all the High Courts for necessary action.

5.

Delay condoned in these appeals.

6.

The civil appeals are admitted.

7.

Tag the appeals with Civil Appeal No. 5442 of 2007.

8.

As regards interim applications, place the matter on 2nd August, 2010.