Supreme CourtDivision Bench(2016) 08 SC CK 0102

Central Bureau Of Investigation vs Arun Jagannath Bansode

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 10 August 2016 · Citation: (2017) ALLMRCri 464

HON’BLE JUDGES
Pinki Chandra Ghose and Amitava Roy, JJ.
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Appeal No. 756 Of 2016 Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 5049 Of 2016

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 234 words

Leave granted.

2.

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

3.

We have gone through the impugned order passed by the High Court. In our view, no cogent reason has been given by the High Court, while deciding the Criminal Writ Petition No.3917 of 2014, to reach the conclusion that the respondent herein did not create any false document. The order of the Session Judge was also placed before us. Hence in our view, the matter should be remanded to the High Court for hearing of Criminal Writ Petition No.3917 of 2014 afresh, in accordance with law, within four weeks.

4.

Accordingly, we allow this appeal on this ground alone, set aside the impugned order of the High Court and remand the matter to the High Court for a fresh decision, in accordance with law with a request to the High Court to decide the matter within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5.

Liberty is granted to the parties to produce all the relevant documents before the High Court.

6.

The High Court shall hear and dispose of the appeal by passing a reasoned order and without being influenced by the observations made by us in this order or by the High Court in the impugned order.

7.

We, however, make it clear that we have not expressed any view on the merits of the controversy.