High CourtsSingle Bench(2004) 12 UK CK 0012

Central Board of Secondary Education vs The Additional District Judge and Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 23 December 2004 · Citation: (2005) 2 UC 1030

HON’BLE JUDGES
Prafulla C. Pant, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No''s. 930 and 932 of 2003 (M/S)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 288 words

Prafulla C. Pant, J.—By means of these petitions, the Petitioner, Central Board of Secondary Education (for brevity hereinafter C.B.S.E.) has sought writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the proceedings of suit No. 53 of 2003 and suit No. 54 of 2003 wherein the Respondents have sought injunction for appearing in the Intermediate (12th Class) examination and for declaration of its result.

2.

Heard Learned Counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3.

Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted that none of the Respondents Nos. 2 to 14 (in writ petition No. 932 (M/S) of 2003) nor Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 (in writ petition No. 930 (M/S) of 2003) have passed 11th class, as such they are not entitled to appear in the Board examination of 12th class of the C.B.S.E. Learned Counsel for the Respondents failed to show me if any of the Respondents has passed the 11th class. That being so, in view of the principle of law laid down in Regional Officer, C.B.S.E. Vs. Ku. Sheena Peethambaran and Others, it is clear that the suit for injunction is not maintainable as injunction cannot be issued against the byelaws of the C.B.S.E. to permit the Plaintiffs to appear in examination. Since the present case is squarely covered by the judgment of Hon''ble the Apex court given in the aforesaid case, the suit before the trial court is not maintainable.

Therefore, both the writ petitions deserve to be allowed and are accordingly allowed. The Proceedings in the Suit No. 53 of 2003 and suit No. 54 of 2003 of the Learned trial court are quashed. Interim orders passed therein stand vacated. The suits shall stand dismissed as barred by jurisdiction. No order as to costs.