High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 09 P&H CK 0087

Cdr. Rajeev sharma (retd) vs State Of Haryana

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 14 September 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Hari Pal Verma, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous -M- No. 25925 of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 188 words

Prayer in this petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.260 dated 19.05.2018 registered

under Sections 186, 506, 34 IPC at Police Station Sector 50, Gurugram, District Gurugram.

Learned State counsel has argued that without having been approached the Sessions Court for the relief claimed in the petition, the petitioner has

straightaway approached this Court.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties.

No doubt under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., there is a concurrent jurisdiction to approach this Court to seek the relief of anticipatory bail, but this Court

finds that instead of straightaway approaching this Court, the petitioner should have approached the Sessions Court.

Faced with this, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of present petition and states that till the time petitioner approaches the

Sessions Court, he may be granted interim protection.

Dismissed as withdrawn.

In case the petitioner files a petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. before the Sessions Court within 10 days from today, the interim order dated

13.06.2018 passed by this Court shall remain in force till filing of the petition.