Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2013) 02 CESTAT CK 0002

CCE, Jaipur-I. vs M/s Lakhlan & Qureshi Construction Company

Customs, Excise And Service Tax Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 17 February 2013

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dr. Satish Chandra, J · V. Padmanabhan, Technical Member
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Service Tax Appeal No. 69 Of 2012

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 179 words
1.

The present appeal is filed by the department against order in original No. 51/2011 dated 17.10.2011 passed by the Commissioner, Central Excise, Jaipur.

2.

Heard Sh. Ranjan Khanna, ld. AR for the Revenue and Shri Rupender Singh, ld. Counsel for the assessee.

3.

After hearing both sides, it appears that against the impugned order the assessee has also filed appeal before the Tribunal (Final Order No. 51039-40/2014 dated 20.02.2014 vide which the Tribunal has remanded the matter to the Commissioner for denovo adjudication.

4.

Hence, we also set-aside the impugned order and remand the departmental appeal to the original authority to decide the issue denovo. During the course of argument, it was informed that the earlier appeal is still pending, if so, then the adjudicating authority may decide both the appeals simultaneously but by providing a reasonable opportunity to the assessee to present their case with liberty to file additional evidence, if any, as per law.

5.

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed by way of remand.

(Dictated and pronounced in the open Court).