Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2015) 06 CESTAT CK 0010

C.C.E , Indore vs M/s. Agro Solvent Products Pvt Ltd.

Customs, Excise And Service Tax Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 19 June 2015

HON’BLE JUDGES
G. Raghuram, J · R. K. Singh, Technical Member
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Appeal No. 849 Of 2009

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

28 paragraphs · 578 words
1.

Revenue has filed appeal against Order-in-Appeal dated 31.07.2009 in terms of which Revenue's appeal before Commissioner (Appeals) seeking

recovery of the refund amount of Rs.6,498/- of service tax paid under 'Technical Testing and Analysis' service [Section [65(105)(zzh) of Finance Act,

1994] in respect of goods exported was sought to be recovered on the ground that the service involved was weighment, sampling and stuffing which

was not covered within the definition of technical testing and analysis service given in Section 65(106) ibid. The Commissioner (Appeals) discussed

the nature of service provided in the name of weighment, sampling and stuffing service and came to a clear finding that it was covered within the

ambit of technical testing and analysis service and thus dismissed the Revenue's appeal before him.

2.

Revenue has contended that weighment, sampling and stuffing of containers is not covered within the scope of technical testing and analysis

service. Stuffing of containers involved supervision of wagon loading/unloading which is not in the nature of technical testing and analysis service.

Similarly sampling and weighing do not fall under the said service.

3.

In the cross objections, respondent referred to the definition of technical testing and analysis service and the scope of the words testing and analysis

and added that the service provider (testing agencies) have submitted reports containing the particulars of the test carried out.

4.

We have considered the contentions of both sides. As per definition of technical testing and analysis service given in Section 65(106) ibid, technical

testing and analysis means ""any service in relation to physical, chemical, biological or any other scientific testing or analysis of goods or

material or information technology software or any immovable property, but does not include any testing or analysis service provided in

relation to human beings or animals."" Physical testing and analysis would clearly include weighment and sampling also is based on certain physical

or chemical characteristics. It is also seen that in this case stuffing required specific conditions/arrangements like putting of silica gel packs together

with craft paper which was technical in nature and thus was a specialised job. As per Section 65(108) ibid technical inspection and certification means

any inspection or examination of goods or process or material or any immovable property to certify that such goods or process or material

or immovable property qualifies or maintains the specified standards, including functionability or utility or quality or any other character or

parameters but does not include any service in relation to inspection of pollution levels."" Testing involves a critical examination, observation or

evaluation and analysis involves examination of a complex, its element and their relation, the identification or separation of ingredient of a substance. It

is not in dispute that the service was rendered by technical agencies engaged in providing service in relation to technical testing and analysis thus

satisfying the definition given in Section 65(107) ibid. In the present case, for determination of the specifications of protein, fat moisture etc. samples

were required to be drawn mixed and then analysed. Indeed, we find that the service providers issued proper certificates certifying weighing, packing

and stuffing and the specification of protein, fat, moisture etc.

5.

In view of the analysis above, we are of the view that refund of the aforesaid amounts was correctly sanctioned as per the provisions of

Notification No.41/2007-ST dated 06.10.2007 as amended. Thus, the impugned order does not suffer from any infirmity. Revenue's appeal is therefore

dismissed. Cross objections also stand disposed of.