High Courts(1997) 05 AHC CK 0175

CARBON INDIA vs INCOME TAX OFFICER.

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 21 May 1997 · Citation: (1998) 146 CTR 402

RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 390 of 1997

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 434 words
1.

By this petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of the impugned demand notice as well as the impugned assessment order, Annexure-9 to the writ petition, giving rise to the demand notice.

2.

Short submission of counsel for the petitioner is that a plea was specifically raised before the assessing authority that notice under s. 148 of the IT Act, 1961 had not been served on the petitioner before assuming jurisdiction for reassessment, but the assessing authority omitted to consider the same. He further submits that the petitioner had come up to this Court earlier also by way of a writ petition challenging the notice issued under s. 148 of the Act, 1961, for the same reason and then by a judgment dt. 8th November, 1996, Annexure-7 to the writ petition, the writ petition was dismissed in limine on the ground that the question of the notice issued under s. 148 not being served was not a pure question of law but a mixed question of law and fact. The Court, however, observed in the said judgment that it was open to the petitioner to raise the said plea before the assessing authority, which would then be decided by him. The submission of counsel for the petitioner is that pursuant to the judgment dt. 8th November, 1996 of this Court, the petitioner had raised this plea before the assessing authority, but he simply omitted to consider the same.

If that is so, the petitioner may make an application seeking rectification of the reassessment order, Annexure-9 to the writ petition, before the assessing authority.

3.

On these facts, the petition is finally disposed of with the observations that the petitioner may make an application for rectification of the reassessment order stating that the plea of the notice under s. 148 not being served was specifically raised, but the assessing authority failed to consider and decide the same. If such application is made by the petitioner within two weeks from today, then the same will be decided by the assessing authority recording a clear finding as to the service of the notice, issued under s. 148, within six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order along with rectification application is produced before him by the petitioner. It is made clear that we have not gone into the merits of the reassessment order at all.

The petitioner may make a prayer for stay of the assessment order till the disposal of the rectification application before the assessing authority.

4.

Certified copy of this order will be supplied to the parties on payment within 24 hours.