High CourtsSingle Bench(2020) 02 CAL CK 0094

Canara Bank vs Deputy Commissioner And Another

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 19 February 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Harish Tandon, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petitions (WP) No. 70 (W) Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

20 paragraphs · 390 words

Harish Tandon, J

Alleging inaction on the part of the respondent authorities more particularly, the Tehsildar, Port Blair, South Andaman in disposing of an application

dated 26th November, 2019, the present writ petition has been filed. The copy of the writ petition has been served upon Mr.Rao, learned advocate in

Court today. Though Mr.Rao prays for an accommodation to go through the contents of the writ petition, but after hearing the writ petitioner I find

that the order which this Court proposes to pass would not impinge upon any rights, if accrued to the respondents.

The writ petitioner obtained a money decree against a borrower from the civil Court. According to the writ petitioner the property comprised in survey

No.261 at Teylarabad village, Port Blair Tehsil, South Andaman was kept as collateral security for the loan lent and advance to the said borrower.

Since the borrower neglected and defaulted in not only servicing the interest but also the payment of the principal amount the suit was filed which was

stood decreed as stated above.

Since the property is still standing in the name of the vendor of the borrower as the borrower did not take any steps to get it mutated in his name, the

writ petitioner approached the Tehsildar for mutating the name of the borrower so that the further steps for realization of the debts can be taken.

Once such approach has been made, the authority cannot keep such representation/application under suspended animation for an indefinite period. It is

expected from such authority to show alacrity and communicate its decision to the person approached for the same instead of keeping the same in

abeyance.

The writ petition is thus disposed of directing the Tehsildar, Port Blair, South Andaman to consider and dispose of the application dated 26th

November, 2019 submitted by the petitioner within four weeks from the date of the communication of this order by recording proper reasons.

It goes without saying that the said decision shall be communicated to the petitioner within a week from the date of the decision.

None of the observations made hereinabove shall have any persuasive value on the merit of the said application, as this Court has no occasion to go

into it.

With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. However, there shall be, no order as to costs.