High CourtsDivision Bench(2018) 01 BOM CK 0032

C/10968 Mohasin Ali Taj Mohd. Shaikh vs The State of Maharashtra

Bombay High Court · Decided on 12 January 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
V.K.Tahilramani, M.S.Karnik
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
4440 of 2016

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

24 paragraphs · 224 words
1.

Heard both sides.

2.

By judgment and order dated 8.10.1993 passed by the

learned Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay in Sessions

Case No. 956 of 1988, the petitioner has been convicted and

sentenced mainly under Section 302 read with Section 34 of

IPC. Being aggrieved thereby, the petitioner preferred Criminal

Appeal No. 630 of 1993 before this Court. By judgment and

order dated 7.12.2016, the appeal preferred by the petitioner

came to be dismissed.

3.

The grievance of the petitioner is that no set off has

been granted to him of the period of detention undergone by

him prior to his conviction. Admittedly, the petitioner was

arrested on 26.5.1988. Thereafter he was granted bail on

29.8.1988. Thus, prior to conviction, he was in custody for

about three months. The grievance of the petitioner is that he

has not been given set off for the period that he was in custody

prior to the date of his conviction. In this view of the matter, it

is directed that as and when the case of the petitioner comes up

for consideration before the State Government for premature

release, the period that he was in custody prior to his

conviction, shall be taken into account by the State Government

as well as the jail authorities.

4.

Rule made absolute in above terms. Petition is

disposed of.