High CourtsDivision Bench(1931) 02 MAD CK 0019

C. Samuel Aaron vs Emperor

Madras High Court · Decided on 6 February 1931 · Citation: AIR 1931 Mad 440 : (1931) 33 LW 571

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jackson, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 136 words

Jackson, J.—The petitioner has been fined Rs. 1,000 for harbouring in Cannanore certain persons from Travancore and Cochin who were

trying to make salt out of sea water. He agrees that they stopped at his vacant hotel, and there is no doubt that he harboured them. But for a

conviction u/s 157, I. P.C., it must be shown that they were hired, engaged or employed, and of that there is really no evidence.

2.

The Police-Inspector P. W. 1 infers that their leader employed them; but one might as well infer that a cricket captain employs his team. It is

quite possible that they were all volunteers hired, engaged and employed by no one.

3.

In that view of the case the conviction cannot stand; the petition is allowed and the fine ordered to be refunded.