Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2023) 04 NCLT CK 0494

Bsmart Tech Private Limited vs M/s. Tubelight Communication Limited

National Company Law Tribunal · Decided on 17 April 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anuradha Sanjay Bhatia, Member (Technical) · Kuldip Kumar Kareer, Member (Judicial)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
IA/1402/2023 in C.P. (IB)/1104(MB)2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 352 words

I.A. 1402 of 2023

The above captioned IA has been filed to withdraw the Company Petition No. 1104 of 2020, filed under section 9, which was admitted on 23.03.2023 and the CIRP process was initiated.

The order dated 23.03.2023, was challenged by Mr. Dheerendra Kumar Singh, Member of the Suspended Board of Directors, before the Hon’ble NCLAT, and the said order is reproduced below;

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI

Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 425 of 2023

IN THE MATTER OF:

Dheerendra Kumar Singh

...Appellant

Versus

Bsmart Tech Pvt. Ltd.

...Respondent

Present:

For Appellant: Mr. Abhijeet Sinha, Mr. Sinha Shrey Nikhilesh, Mr. Swastik Verma, Mr. Nayan Dubey, Advocates Mr. Shwetabh Sinha for Operational Creditor For Respondent: Mr. Gautam Singhal, Mr. Pankaj for R-2/ IRP

O R D E R

13.04.2023: Heard Learned Counsel for the Appellant as well as Learned Counsel for the Operational Creditor and Learned Counsel for the IRP. This Appeal has been filed against the order passed by the Adjudicating Authority dated 23.03.2023 admitting Section 9 application filed by the Operational Creditor. An application I.A. No. 1453 of 2023 has been filed brining on record the settlement dated 05.04.2023 between the parties.

2.

It is submitted that in pursuance of the settlement the entire payment has been made to the Operational Creditor. Learned Counsel for the Operational Creditor submits that payment under settlement has already been made.

3.

Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that fees and expenses of the IRP have also been paid which is not disputed by Learned Counsel by the IRP.

Exhibit reproduced from the original judgment

In the light of the above order passed by the Hon’ble NCLAT whereby the order dated 23.03.2023 has been set aside and Hon’ble NCLAT has categorically stated that CIRP process will not continue any further, this Bench allows the application under Section 12A of IBC. Accordingly, the Company Petition No. 1104 of 2020 is dismissed as withdrawn and I.A. no. 1402 of 2023 is allowed and disposed of.

In view of the disposal of the above Company Petition, all the pending IA’s and MA’s, if any, also stands disposed of.