Tribunals and Commissions(2005) 10 NCDRC CK 0079

BRAHMARSHI PT. VIDYASHANKAR VYAS vs D.E.T.

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission · Decided on 18 October 2005 · Citation: 2006 1 CPJ 292 : 2006 1 CPR 220

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sunil Kumar Garg , Sushma Tanwar , T.P.Gupta J.
RESULT
Appeal allowed

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 244 words
1.

BOTH these appeals are being decided by this common judgment as in both of them common questions of fact and law arise. Appeal No. 1196/2003 Pt. Vidyashankar Vyas & Ors. v. D.E. Telephones & Ors. This appeal has been filed by the appellants against order dated 24.5.2003 passed by the District Forum, Dungarpur by which the complaint of the appellants was dismissed.

2.

IN this appeal it has been submitted that during the course when the matter was pending before the District Forum a prayer was made by the respondents to cross-examine the complainants on their affidavits but that prayer was not allowed. It has been frankly submitted by the learned Counsel for the appellants that his clients are ready to face cross-examination and the matter be remanded back to the District Forum. The learned Counsel for the respondents has no objection. For the reasons mentioned above the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the District Forum, Dungarpur with the direction that now the respondents could cross-examine the complainants and thereafter the District Forum would decide the complaint afresh on merits in accordance with law. Parties are directed to appear before the District Forum, Dungarpur on 1.12.2005. Appeal No. 1197/2003 Pt. Mukesh Vyas & Ors. v. D.E. Telephones & Ors. In terms of the decision in Appeal No. 1196/2003, Pt. Vidyashankar Vyas and Ors. v. D. E. Telephones and Ors., this appeal also decided accordingly. Appeal allowed.