Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2026) 06 ITAT CK 1672

Braham Prakash vs ITO

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench, ‘B’: New Delhi · Decided on 5 June 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
C.N. Prasad, Judicial Member · Renu Jauhri, Accountant Member
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
ITA No.9098 & 9100/Del/2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 169 words

PER C.N. PRASAD, J.M.

These two appeals are filed by the assessee against different orders of the Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi dated 15.10.2025 for the A.Y. 2019-20 and 2020-21 respectively.

2.

Ld. Counsel for the assessee at the outset submitted that in both these appeals were dismissed by Ld. CIT(A) without admitting additional evidences furnished by the assessee. Therefore, it is prayed that appeals be restored to the file of the AO to consider the evidences afresh and complete the assessment in accordance with law after providing adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee.

3.

Considering the rival submissions and perusing the orders of the authorities below we feel it appropriate to restore these appeals to the file of the AO to decide the issue in appeal afresh and in accordance with law after providing adequate opportunity to the assessee. The assessee is at liberty to file all the necessary information to support its contentions.

4.

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose.