High CourtsSingle Bench(2011) 01 CAL CK 0076

Biswanath Chakraborty vs C.C. (Preventive), West Bengal

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 10 January 2011 · Citation: (2011) 270 ELT 170 : (2012) 26 STR 385

HON’BLE JUDGES
Indira Banerjee, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 21189 (W) of 2010

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 318 words

Indira Banerjee, J.—In this writ application, the petitioner, being the Customs House Clearing Agent holding license under Customs Hosue Agents Licensing Regulations, 2004, hereinafter referred to as CHALR, 2004, has challenged Order No. S-719/A-899/Kol/08 dated 15th September, 2008 passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Eastern Regional Bench, Kolkata in Customs Appeal No. 230/2008. The order impugned is set out hereinbelow for convenience :

Heard both sides. Considering the fact that only a petty amount of Rs. 10,000/- is involved in this case, the appeal as well as the stay petition are dismissed at the admission stage without going into the merit of the case.

2.

The learned Tribunal has apparently not considered the merits of the appeal, but dismissed the appeal on the ground that a petty amount of Rs. 10,000/- had been imposed on the appellant by way of penalty.

3.

There is no provision for dismissal of an appeal only on the ground of the penalty amount being a paltry amount. The learned Tribunal was obliged to consider the merits of the appeal.

4.

There being an apparent error on the face of the impugned order, this Court does not deem it necessary to call for affidavits. The order impugned is set aside. The learned Tribunal is directed to consider the appeal afresh in accordance with law, preferably within four months from the date of communication of this order.

5.

The petitioner shall, however, without prejudice to his rights and contentions in the appeal, deposit the penalty of Rs. 10,000/-. Needless to mention that in the event the appeal succeeds, the petitioner shall be entitled to refund of the penalty amount. The penalty amount shall be deposited within three weeks from date.

6.

The writ application is disposed of.

7.

Urgent certified Photostat copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance of all requisite formalities.