High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 06 GAU CK 0017

Bishnu Daulagupu And 7 Ors vs State Of Assam And 6 Ors

Gauhati High Court · Decided on 1 June 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
N. Kotiswar Singh, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 2978 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

18 paragraphs · 345 words
1.

The Court proceedings have been conducted through video-conference.

2.

Heard Mr. K.N. Choudhury, learned Senior counsel for the petitioners.

3.

Issue notice, returnable within three weeks.

4.

Mr. K.P. Pathak, learned Standing Counsel, Forest Department, accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2 whereas Mr. R. Das, learned

Standing Counsel, North Cachar Hills Autonomous Council (NCHAC) appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.3 to 7.

5.

The petitioners have approached this Court seeking for an appropriate order to protect their land which are sought to be acquired for the purpose of

compensatory afforestation for setting up of 120 MW Lower Kopili Hydro Electric Project at Longku. The petitioners are residents of Nabdi

Daulagupu village under Haflong Range which is included among other villages for the purpose of compensatory afforestation as indicated in the letter

dated 01.06.2019 of the Secretary, NCHAC, Haflong.

6.

Perhaps, at the request of the villagers including the petitioners, the NCHAC authorities are seeking to exclude the petitioners’ village for the

purpose of the compensatory afforestation by choosing another location as can be seen from the communication dated 06.02.2021 from the Secretary,

Revenue, NCHAC issued to the Chief Conservator of Forests, Dima Hasao district, Haflong. However, the petitioners apprehend that in spite of such

a proposal, as the matter has not been finalized, the petitioners’ land may be acquired for the purpose of compensatory afforestation in terms of

the earlier communication dated 01.06.2019. Accordingly, the petitioners are before this Court.

7.

As regards the interim prayer, he has been made to understand that the Council authorities are in touch with the petitioners to exclude their village

for the purpose of compulsory afforestation. However, Mr. Das submits that he would like to take more definitive instructions in this regard. If that is

so, the interim prayer can be considered on the next date. However, till then, it is provided that the status quo as regards the petitioners’ village for

the purpose of compensatory afforestation in terms of the communication dated 01.06.2019 (Annexure-B to the writ petition) shall be maintained.