High CourtsSingle Bench(2026) 07 MP CK 0896

Biresh Singh Baghel vs State Of M.P. & Ors.

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 27 July 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vishal Dhagat, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 26633 of 2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

22 paragraphs · 988 words

Petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India making a prayer to issue direction to respondents-authorities to make full payment of pension, gratuity, leave encashment along with interest from the date of entitlement of petitioner.

2.

Learned senior counsel appearing for petitioner submitted that petitioner retired on 30.06.2024. It is submitted that neither charge-sheet has been filed nor cognizance has been taken, therefore, it cannot be said that any judicial proceedings were instituted against petitioner. It is submitted that an FIR under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is registered against petitioner. It is further submitted that Rule 64 for payment of provisional pension cannot be applied in case of petitioner. Learned senior counsel for petitioner relied upon Rule 9(6)(b) of Madhya Pradesh Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976.

3.

Rule 9(6)(b) of Madhya Pradesh Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976 reads as under :

9(6)(b) judicial proceedings shall be deemed to be instituted -

(i)in the case of criminal proceedings, on the date on which the complaint or report of a police officer, of which the Magistrate takes cognizance, is made, and

(ii)in the case of civil proceedings, on the date the plaint is presented in the Court.

4.

It is submitted by learned senior counsel that since no cognizance has been taken and neither any charge-sheet has been filed before retirement of petitioner, therefore, it cannot be said that judicial proceedings are instituted. Provisional pension under Rule 64 of The M.P. Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976 is to be granted to a delinquent employee, if departmental or judicial proceedings are instituted as mentioned in Rule 9(4) of Madhya Pradesh Civil Services (Pension) Rules. In view of same, respondents have committed an error of law in only sanctioning provisional pension to petitioner.

5.

Govt. Advocate appearing for State opposed the prayer and relied upon Rule 64 of of MP Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976. Rule 64 of the Rules, 1976 is quoted as under :

64. Provisional pension where departmental or judicial proceeding

may be pending :-

(1)

(a) In respect of a Government servant referred to in sub-rule (4) of rule 9, the Head of office shall authorize the provisional pension equal to the maximum pension which would have been admissible on the basis of qualifying service upto the date of retirement of the Government servant, or if he was under suspension on the date of retirement upto the date immediately preceding the date on which he was placed under suspension;

(b)

The provisional pension shall be drawn on establishment pay bill and paid to the retired Government servant by the Head of office during the period commencing from the date of retirement upto and including the date on which, after the conclusion of departmental or judicial proceedings, final orders are passed by the competent authority;

(c)

No gratuity shall be paid to the Government servant until the conclusion of the departmental or judicial proceedings and issue of final orders thereon;

provided that where departmental proceedings have been instituted under rule 16 of the Madhya Pradesh Civil Services (Classification Control and Appeal) Rules, 1966, for imposing any of the penalties specified in clause (i), (ii) and (iv) of rule 10 of the said rules, the payment of provisional gratuity to the extent of 90% of the gratuities admissible under the rules shall also be authorized to be paid to the Government servant.

(2)

Provisional gratuity shall be drawn on establishment pay bill and paid to the retired Government servant by the Head of office after adjusting dues mentioned in sub-rule (2) of rule 60 under intimation to audit office. Payment of provisional pension/ gratuity made under sub-rule (1) shall be adjusted against final retirement benefits sanctioned to such Government servant upon conclusion of such proceedings, but recovery shall not be made where the pension/gratuity finally sanctioned is less than the provisional pension/gratuity or the pension/gratuity is reduced or withheld either permanently or for a specified period.

Note: Grant of provisional pension under rule 64 is mandatory even if departmental or judicial proceedings is continued.". In view of same, Govt. Advocate appearing for State submitted that judicial proceedings are pending, therefore, as per Rule 64 of the Rules, 1976, only provisional pension is to be paid.

6.

Heard learned counsel for parties.

7.

Heading of Rule 64 of Rules of 1976, is as under:-

Provisional pension where department or judicial proceedings may be pending.

However, leaving apart heading of Rule 64, body of Rule 64 lays down that Rule 64 will be applicable in respect of government servants referred to in Sub-rule 4 of Rule 9. Sub-rule 4 of Rule 9 uses the words ''departmental or judicial proceedings are instituted" and not words "departmental or judicial proceedings are pending". Meaning of word "institution of proceedings" is defined in Rule 9(6). In case of departmental proceedings, same is said to be instituted on date on which statement of charges is issued to government servant or pensioner or on date when government servant is placed under suspension. In cases where FIRs are registered against government servant, criminal proceedings is said to have been instituted on date when Magistrate takes cognizance of police report or complaint. In happening of event under Rule 9(6), Rule 9(4) and Rule 64 of Rules of 1976 can be applied. In present case, cognizance of offence has not been taken on date of retirement of petitioner, therefore, no judicial proceedings were instituted against petitioner and resort to Rule 64 of Rules of 1976 could not be made by respondent authority.

8.

Resultantly, writ petition filed by petitioner is allowed and disposed of with directions to respondents-authorities to make full payment of pension, gratuity, leave encashment to petitioner from the date of entitlement within a period of 60 days from date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today.

9.

Writ petition is allowed and disposed of. Certified copy as per rules.