High CourtsDivision Bench(2014) 10 J&K CK 0039

Bir Singh and Others vs State of JandK

Jammu And Kashmir High Court · Decided on 29 October 2014 · Citation: (2015) 2 JKJ 422

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dhiraj Singh Thakur, J · Bansi Lal Bhat, J.
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal M.A. No. 137/2014 in Criminal Appeal No. 6 Of 2005, Criminal M.A. No. 4 Of 2006, 35/2014, 133 Of 2012, 125 Of 2013 and Confirm No. 2 Of 2005

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 357 words

Bansi Lal Bhat, J.

Cr. M.A. No. 137/2014

1.

This is an application filed on behalf of applicant No. 4-sister-in law (Nanand) of deceased for grant of bail. Bail is sought on two grounds of

which only one survives. The first ground taken in the application is that the applicant has never celebrated any festival with her kids as she was in

jail and her kids wanted to celebrate Diwali with their mother. This ground no more survives as the Diwali festival is over. The 2nd ground urged is

that the mother of applicant namely, Shakuntala Devi is out on bail on medical grounds and on account of her poor health she is unable to finalize

the arrangements for engagement ceremony of her son Subash Chander who is younger brother of the applicant.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3.

The appellants/applicants including applicant No. 4 stand convicted under Sections 302/498-A RPC. Other appellants/applicants are the

parents-in-law and husband of the deceased. The appellants/applicants allegedly set ablaze the deceased barely within six months of her marriage

with appellant/applicant No. 2 resulting in her death. The murder was allegedly committed for dowry in a depraved manner when the deceased

was carrying a pregnancy of three months. Prosecution case, primarily rests on Sing declaration of deceased as the mode of proof. The dying

declaration was made in presence of the Doctor who was examined at the trial to prove the mental composition of deceased and genuineness of

the dying declaration attributed to deceased.

4.

In view of these facts, the earlier bail plea of appellants/applicants was declined by this Court in terms of order dated 14.03.2005. Admittedly,

the conviction and sentence of life imprisonment on the appellants/applicants including applicant No. 4 has not been suspended, grant of interim bail

to applicant No. 4 for finalizing the arrangements for engagement ceremony of her younger brother in the given circumstances of the case, does not

warrant her admission on interim bail.

5.

There being no merit in the application, same is rejected.

Cr. Appeal No. 6/2005

List along with the CrMP(s) for consideration in the week commencing 24th November, 2014.