High CourtsSingle Bench(2011) 07 KL CK 0029

Binu Mathew vs State of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 26 July 2011

HON’BLE JUDGES
K.T. Sankaran, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 5715 of 2011

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 285 words

K.T. Sankaran, J.—This is an application for bail u/s 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Petitioner is the accused in Crime No. 1138 of 2011 of Ernakulam Town North Police Station.

2.

The offence alleged against the Petitioner is u/s 22(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act.

3.

The prosecution case is that on 17.6.2011 at 8.30 A.M., the accused was found carrying 519 ampules of Lupigesic, near Ernakulam North Railway Station. He was arrested on the spot and he was remanded to judicial custody.

4.

The Bail Application is seriously opposed by the learned Public Prosecutor. The quantity of psychotropic substance involved in the case is commercial quantity. Clause (b) of Section 37(1) of the NDPS Act provides that when the quantity of the contraband involved is commercial quantity and where the Public Prosecutor opposes the Bail Application, bail can be granted only if the Court is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for believing that the accused is not guilty of the offence and that he is not likely to commit any offence while on bail. These ingredients are not satisfied in the present case. It cannot be said that there are reasonable grounds for believing that the Petitioner is not guilty of the offence. There is also no material to arrive at the conclusion that the Petitioner is not likely to commit any offence while on bail.

5.

The learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted that the Petitioner is suffering from liver cirrhosis and tuberculosis. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that adequate treatment will be provided to the Petitioner either in the jail or elsewhere. This submission is recorded.

For the reasons mentioned above, the Bail Application is dismissed.