High CourtsDivision Bench(1919) 02 CAL CK 0037

Binode Behari Pati vs Chaudhuri and Co.

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 24 February 1919 · Citation: 50 Ind. Cas. 453

HON’BLE JUDGES
Teunon, J · Newbould, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 163 words
1.

This Rule is directed against an order by which the learned Subordinate Judge of Burdwan allowed the plaintiff, who was the appellant before him, to withdraw his appeal and also the original suit with liberty to bring a fresh suit in respect of the same cause of action. In his order he has not stated what in his judgment were the sufficient grounds for permitting the plaintiff to take this course. But from the petition supported by affidavit before us and not controverted by the appellant, it appears that the plaintiff''s reason for desiring to withdraw the appeal and suit was that he desired to adduce additional evidence. That is not a proper reason for permitting the plaintiff-appellant to withdraw his appeal and suit.

2.

We, therefore, set aside this order and direct that the appeal be re admitted and heard and determined on the merits.

3.

The plaintiff-appellant not appearing here we make no order as to costs in this Rule.