Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2022) 06 NCLT CK 0019

Binod Kumar vs Excella Real Project & Ltd

National Company Law Tribunal · Decided on 8 June 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajasekhar V.K., Member (J) · Balraj Joshi, Member (T)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Comp. AppealNo.1483/KB/2020 In C.P. No. 1639/KB/2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 441 words

Balraj Joshi, Member (Technical)

1.

The court convened via hybrid mode.

2.

This  is  an  Application  byMr.  Binod  Kumar  (‘Applicant’),  who  seeks  an orderfor execution of the order dated 31 January, 2020 by this Tribunal. The amount involved for recovery is a sum of ₹6,30,000/- (Rupees Six Lakh Thirty Thousand only) plus interest thereon @9%.

3.

On 31 January, 2020 the Applicant had obtained a decree from this tribunal under section 73 (4) of the Companies Act, 2013, wherein, this Tribunal had directed the Company i.e., the Respondent No.1 to repay the maturity value of the amount deposited by the applicant with the Company. Thereafter, on 19 February, 2020 and 24 February, 2020 the applicant approached and intimated the judgment debtor i.e., the respondent No.1 along with other respondents about the order of this Tribunal but no action actions were taken by the respondents.

4.

We have considered the submissions made on behalf of the applicant and also perused the record.

5.

Section 71(10) stipulates the conditions under which the Tribunal may direct the Company to redeem the debentures. The conditions as indicated are that the Company should have either failed to redeem the debentures on the date of their maturity or failed to pay the interest thereon on their due date. The other conditions to be satisfied before the Tribunal passes an order is that the Tribunal is required to hear the parties concerned. In the present case, the respondents have not chosen to appear before this Tribunal in spite of opportunities granted.

6.

In Akhil R. Kothakota and another v. M/s Tierra Farm Assets Company Pvt. Ltd. (Company Appeal (AT) No.39 of 2020 decided on 09.11.2020), the Hon'ble NCLAT has held that section 71(10) provides a clear mechanism for issue and repayment of debentures, including enforcement of payment obligations. Once the factum of default is established, this Tribunal is obligated to pass an order in terms of section 71(10) of the Act. This will be in addition to any action that SEBI may take against the company and its promoters and directors under SEBI Act,1992.

7.

In this view of the matter, this Tribunal hereby directs the repayment of deposits of ₹6,30,000/- (Rupees Six Lakh Thirty Thousand only) plus interest @9% within a period of three months from the date of pronouncement of this order. The Applicant is also entitled to a cost of ₹25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) to be payable by the Respondent No. 1.

8.

Comp. Appeal No.1483/KB/2020 in C.P. No. 1649/KB/2018 shall stand disposed of accordingly.

9.

Certified copy of the order may be issued, if applied for, upon compliance of all requisite formalities.