High CourtsSingle Bench(2016) 08 P&H CK 0184

Bikkar Singh vs State of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 31 August 2016 · Citation: (2016) 4 SCT 311

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rakesh Kumar Jain, J.
RESULT
Disposed Off
CASE NUMBER
CWP No. 12977 of 2011

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 234 words

Rakesh Kumar Jain, J. (Oral) - This petition is filed against the order dated 26.04.2011 (Annexure P-3) by which the petitioners have been asked to pay the amount which is alleged to have been illegally obtained by them under the Old Age Pension Policy. The only contention raised by counsel for the petitioner is that the respondents have not given any show cause notice before issuing recovery notice and have thus, violated the principal of natural justice much less audi alteram partem.

2.

Counsel for the respondents has fairly conceded that there is not even a whisper in the reply submitted by the State from which it can be inferred that any show cause notice was given to the petitioner and they were associated in any kind of inquiry before recovery notice was issued to them.

3.

Since there is a complete violation of principal of natural justice, therefore, the recovery notices are illegal as the petitioners are entitled to show cause notice and are also entitled to be joined with the inquiry before it is held that they are not entitled to the Old Age Pension Policy.

4.

Consequently, the impugned order dated 26.04.2011 (Annexure P-3) is hereby set aside/quashed and the matter is remanded back to the respondents to initiate proceedings against the petitioner, if so desired, in accordance with law, much less following the principal of natural justice as stated hereinabove.