Supreme CourtDivision Bench(2015) 04 SC CK 0177

Bijendra Singh and others vs State of Uttar Pradesh and others

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 9 April 2015 · Citation: (2015) 4 RCR(Civil) 632

HON’BLE JUDGES
H.L. Dattu, C.J.I. and Arun Mishra, JJ.
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal Nos. 3595-3596 of 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 34981-34982 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 3597 of 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 4554 of 2012), Civil Appeal Nos. 3598-3599 of 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 6816-6817 2012), Civil Appeal Nos

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

18 paragraphs · 577 words

Delay, in filing application(s) for substitution, if any, is condoned.

Application(s) for substitution, if any, is allowed.

Delay, in filing the special leave petitions, if any, is condoned.

Civil Appeal No. 3595-3596 of 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 34981-34982 of 2011)

1.

Leave granted. The appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, in Writ C - No. 66643 of 2010 and Writ-C No. 57238 of 2010.

2.

The High Court while granting several reliefs to the writ Petitioners had also observed that the Petitioners are required to be heard in the matter and therefore, had permitted the Petitioners to file their objections, if any, Under Section 5-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, "the Act"). However, the High Court had thought it fit not to quash the declaration made Under Section 6 of the Act.

3.

Several contentions are raised by the learned Counsel for the Appellants before us. In our view all these contentions can be taken up by the Appellants when they file their objections Under Section 5-A of the Act. Therefore, we are not noticing or considering those contentions which are canvassed before us by learned Counsel for the Appellants.

4.

This Court while entertaining the special leave petitions, had granted an order of status quo in favour of the Appellants and the said order is still operating against the Respondents.

5.

In view of the above, we dispose of these appeals. We grant four weeks'' time to the Appellants to file their objections Under Section 5-A of the Act before the competent authorities. If such objections are filed within the time granted by this Court, we direct the authorities to consider the same in accordance with law and pass an appropriate speaking order.

6.

We also reserve liberty to the Appellants to raise all such contentions which are available to them, including the contentions raised in these appeals and argued before us at the time of hearing of these appeals.

7.

The status quo order granted by us will operate against the Respondents till a decision is taken by the Respondents on the objections that may be filed by the Appellants Under Section 5-A of the Act.

8.

We may note that, if for any reason, the Appellants are of the view that since the High Court had granted them liberty to file their objections Under Section 5-A of the Act, the High Court ought to have quashed Section 6 notification. If that is so, we reserve liberty to the Appellants to file appropriate review petition(s) before the High Court it-self.

9.

If for any reason, the Appellants fail before the High Court in the Review Petition, they are at liberty to move this Court once again, challenging the order passed in the Review Petition as well as the order impugned in the present appeals.

10.

All the contentions of both the parties are kept open to be agitated before the High Court.

In Rest of the matters

11.

Leave granted. All the civil appeals are disposed of in the same terms, observations and directions as in civil appeals arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 34981-34982 of 2011.

Contempt Petition (C) No. 534 of 2014 In Special Leave Petition (C) Nos. 17068-17071 of 2012

The contempt petition is disposed of in view of the order passed in the civil appeals arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 34981-34982 of 2011, and connected matters.