High CourtsSingle Bench(1914) 04 AHC CK 0017

Bidhachal Prasad Rai vs Lal Bihari Rai and Others

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 15 April 1914 · Citation: 25 Ind. Cas. 330

HON’BLE JUDGES
Piggott, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 188 words

Piggott, J.—In view of the definition of the word "offence" in the Code of Criminal Procedure, it is clear that a person in respect of whom information has been laid before a Magistrate to the effect that he is likely to commit a breach of the peace or is otherwise liable to the provisions of Section 107 of the Code, is not a person accused of any offence. An order for payment of compensation cannot be made against a man who has petitioned a Magistrate to take action u/s 107 of the Code. The objection is one which should have been taken before the Magistrate when the petitioner, Bindhachal Prasad, was called upon to show cause why the order u/s 250 should not be made against him; but the order complained of being, in my opinion, illegal, I cannot allow it to stand now that it has come before ma in revision. I set aside the order directing Bindhachal Prasad to pay. compensation to each of the four persons in respect, of whom proceedings, u/s 107 of the Code were taken. The money, if paid, will be refunded.