High CourtsDivision Bench(2025) 05 UK CK 0667

Bhupendra Bhaisora vs State Of Uttarakhand & Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 5 May 2025

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J · Ashish Naithani, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (S/B) No. 245 Of 2016

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 160 words

Manoj kumar tiwari. J

1.

Petitioner was appointed as Manager Technical in Disaster Mitigation and Management Centre on contract with effect from 16.11.2005. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought a direction to the competent authority to consider his claim for regularization on the basis of Regularization Rules applicable to the state employees.

2.

It is not in dispute that State Government has framed Rules for regularization of contract/adhoc/daily wages employees in the year 2013. As per those Rules, anyone who was appointed on contract/adhoc/daily wages basis has a right to be considered for regularization, against available vacancies.

3.

Since petitioner was appointed in the year 2005, therefore, the writ petition is disposed of by directing the competent authority i.e. respondent no.2, to refer petitioner’s case for regularization to the Regularization Committee, and pass necessary order as per provisions of the regularization Rules within six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order.