High CourtsFull Bench(1894) 02 CAL CK 0004

Bhola Kaiburto and Another vs Gourhari Kaiburto

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 1 February 1894 · Citation: (1894) ILR (Cal) 233

HON’BLE JUDGES
W. Comer Petheram, C.J · Prinsep, J · O''Kinealy, J · Norris, J · Ghose, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 92 words

W. Comer Petheram, C.J.—The terms of Regulation XI of 1825, Section 4 Clause (1), are in opinion clear; the plaintiff who has an occupancy right in a jote is entitled to bold the lands in dispute as an increment to that jote. We therefore agree in the view of the law expressed in the cases of Gobind Monee Debia v. Dinobundhoo Shaha 15 W.R. 87 Attimoollah v. Saheboollah 15 W.R. 149 and Bhagabat Prasad Sing v. Durg Bijai Sing 8 B.L.R. 73 : 16 W.R. 95. The appeal is dismissed with costs.