High CourtsDivision Bench(2025) 12 DEL CK 3480

Bhim Singh Kothari & Ors. vs Union Of India & Ors.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 9 December 2025

HON’BLE JUDGES
C. Hari Shankar, J · Om Prakash Shukla, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
W.P.(C) 18671/2025 & CM APPL. 77599/2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 151 words

C. Hari Shankar, J.

1.

The petitioners who are employed as Commandants in the Indian Coast Guard and who are scheduled to retire at the age of 57, have moved this writ petition praying that their age of retirement be extended to 60.

2.

An identical issue has come up before this Court in Cheeli J Ratnam v. Union of India1 and a batch of similar matters which have been decided by us by judgment dated 24 November 2025, in which we have held that all personnel in the Coast Guard are entitled to retire at 60.

3.

Mr Dhananjai Rana, learned CGSC for the respondents, acknowledges the fact that the case is covered by our decision in Cheeli J Ratnam.

4.

Accordingly, it is declared that the petitioners would be entitled to retire at the age of 60.

5.

The writ petition stands allowed accordingly.

Footnotes

  1. 1.2025 SCC OnLine Del 8573