High CourtsSingle Bench(2019) 02 CHH CK 0394

Bhikham Prasad vs Rajeshwari Chandane

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 21 February 2019

HON’BLE JUDGES
Arvind Singh Chandel, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Revision No. 154 Of 2016

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 260 words

Arvind Singh Chandel, J

1.

The instant revision has been preferred against the order dated 26.12.2015 passed by the Family Court, Durg in Miscellaneous Criminal Case

No.234 of 2015, whereby the Family Court has allowed the application under Section 127 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and enhanced the

monthly maintenance from Rs.7,500/- to Rs.15,000/- in favour of the Respondent/wife and her two children, namely, Anjusha Chandane and Vivek

Raj Chandane. Initially, vide order dated 1.7.2014 passed in Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.66 of 2013, the Family Court had granted monthly

maintenance of Rs.7,500/- in favour of the Respondent/wife and her above-named two children. Thereafter, the application under Section 127 of the

Code of Criminal Procedure, being Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.234 of 2015 was preferred by the Respondent/wife and her above-named two

children for enhancement in the monthly maintenance. The said application for enhancement has been allowed vide the impugned order dated

26.12.2015. Hence, this revision by the husband/Applicant.

2.

Learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant/husband, after arguing for sometime, made a submission that since the impugned order dated

26.12.2015 has been passed in favour of the Respondent/wife and her two children Anjusha Chandane and Vivek Raj Chandane and he has not

impleaded the children Anjusha Chandane and Vivek Raj Chandane as party-Respondent in the instant revision, he wants to withdraw the instant

revision with liberty to file a fresh revision impleading Anjusha Chandane and Vivek Raj Chandane as party-Respondent therein.

3.

In view of the above submission, reserving the liberty as sought for, the instant revision is dismissed as withdrawn.