High CourtsSingle Bench(2026) 10 CHH CK 2422

Bharti Dhruv & Ors. vs Lekhram Sahu & Anr.

Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur · Decided on 16 October 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal, J
RESULT
Partly Allowed
CASE NUMBER
MAC No. 1015 of 2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

30 paragraphs · 556 words
1.

This appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short the "Act of 1988") has been preferred by the appellants/claimants seeking enhancement of the amount of compensation, challenging the impugned award dated 11.02.2026, passed in Claim Case No.12/2024 by learned Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Gariyaband (CG), whereby the learned Claims Tribunal has awarded a total sum of Rs.17,40,760/- as compensation for the death of Roop Singh who was aged about 28 years and died in a road accident which took place on 26.01.2024.

2.

Learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the learned Claims Tribunal has erred in awarding lesser amount of compensation in the facts of the case. The Claims Tribunal has assessed the income of the deceased on the lower side and has also awarded lesser amount under other conventional heads, which needs to be enhanced. Therefore, the instant appeal be allowed and the compensation awarded by the Claims Tribunal may suitably be enhanced.

3.

None appeared on behalf of the Respondents.

4.

I have heard learned counsel appearing for the appellant, considered his rival submissions made herein-above and went through the records with utmost circumspection.

5.

In the case at hand, it is true that the learned Tribunal has taken the monthly income of the deceased to be Rs.7800/-, which ought to be Rs.10100/- as per the Chhattisgarh Minimum Wages Notification issued by the office of Labour Commissioner, Chhattisgarh. Furthermore, in other conventional heads the Tribunal has granted only Rs.70,000 which ought to be 2,76,000/-, to that extent the impugned award needs to be modified.

6.

Thus, in light of the aforesaid discussion and in light of the judgments of the Supreme Court rendered in the matters of National Insurance Company Ltd. V. Pranay Sethi1, Sarla Verma & Ors. Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation & Ors2 and Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Nanu Ram @ Chuhru Ram & Ors3, this Court is computing the compensation as below:-

Sr.

No.

HeadsCompensation awarded by the TribunalCompensation awarded by this Court
1Income

Rs. 7800 x 12 =

93,600/-

Rs. 10100 x 12 =

1,21,200/-

2.

Future

prospect

(+)40% (i.e. Rs. 37440) = 1,31,040/-(+)40% (i.e. Rs. 48,480) = 1,69,680/-
3.Deduction(-) 1/4 (i.e.(-) 1/4 (i.e. 42420)

32760) =

98,280/-

= 1,27,260/-
4.Multiplier

(x) 17 =

16,70,760/-

(x) 17 =

21,63,420/-

5Other conventional headsRs. 70,000/-Rs. 2,76,000/-(18000+18000+240 000)
TotalRs. 17,40,760/-Rs. 24,39,420/-
7.

In view of the aforesaid analysis, the amount of compensation of Rs.17,40,760/- awarded by the Claims Tribunal is enhanced to Rs.24,39,420/-. Hence, after deducting the amount of Rs.17,40,760/-, the appellants are held entitled for an additional amount of Rs.6,98,660/-. The additional amount of compensation shall carry interest @ 6% per annum from filing of the claim application before the Claims Tribunal till its realization. Rest of the conditions of the impugned award shall remain intact.

8.

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed and the impugned award is modified to the extent as indicated herein-above.

9.

The Registry is directed to communicate the claimants in writing “the enhanced amount” in this appeal as against the award made by the concerned Tribunal. The said communication be made in Hindi Deonagri language and the help of paralegal workers may be availed with a co-ordination of Secretary, Legal Aid of the concerned area wherein the claimants resides.

Footnotes

  1. 1.(2017) 16 SCC 680
  2. 2.(2009) 6 SCC 121
  3. 3.(2018) 18 SCC 130