High CourtsDivision Bench(2022) 04 BOM CK 0010

Bharti vs State Of Maharashtra And Others

Bombay High Court · Decided on 4 April 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
V. K. Jadhav, J · Sandipkumar. C. More, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Writ Petition No. 454 Of 2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 180 words

V.K. Jadhav. J

1.

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of the parties, heard finally at admission stage.

2.

The missing person viz. Prabhakar Piraji Tayde is now produced before us on wheel chair. He is also accompanied by his young son, aged 12 years. Learned A.P.P. has placed before us the police papers and the report submitted by P. S. I. Mr. Chabukswar, attached to City Chowk Police Station, Aurangabad. The concerned investigating officer has also recorded the statement of said Prabhakar Piraji Tayde. The said Prabhakar Piraji Tayde has stated before us that he is not detained by anyone. If at all there is dispute about the relations between the petitioner and said Prabhakar Tayde, it is for the parties to establish their rights before the competent Court, in accordance with law. However, since the said Prabhakar Tayde, who is brought before us has informed to us that he is not detained illegally by anyone, we direct the police to set him free forthwith.

3.

Rule of habeas corpus stands discharged. Writ petition is accordingly disposed of.