Supreme CourtDivision Bench(1993) 10 SC CK 0002

Bharat Oil Mills and Another vs Commissioner of Sales Tax and Another

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 27 October 1993 · Citation: (1994) 3 SCC 355 Supp : (1994) 92 STC 310

HON’BLE JUDGES
S. P. Bharucha, J · B.P. Jeevan Reddy, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal No. 593 Of 1979

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 290 words
1.

We see absolutely no substance in this appeal.

2.

The appellants applied for registration as a dealer under the Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947, on. September 21, 1951, in form I. In the registration certificate, it was not stated that the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of oil from the oil-seeds to be purchased by them, As a result thereof, they were liable to pay purchase tax on the oil-seeds purchased by them.

3.

After 23 years, i.e. on May 6, 1974, the appellants applied for correcting their certificate and to include the said activity in their certificate. The certificate was amended but with prospective effect only. The appellants wanted the correction to be made with retrospective effect from the year 1951. This plea was rejected by the Commissioner, Sales Tax, in revision, and by the High Court in writ petition.

4.

We see no justification for the appellants to keep quiet for a period of 23 years and then come forward with an application for correction with retrospective effect from 1951. The appellants cannot plead ignorance of non-inclusion of oil-seeds for the purpose of extracting oil there from in their certificate for such a long period. The counsel for the appellants argues that in their application for registration made in the year 1951, they had asked the oil-seeds to be entered in their certificate. Assuming that it is so, it must be held, in the light of the above conduct that they have abandoned the said claim. They accepted the certificate as issued and acted upon it for a period of 23 years. They cannot now seek retrospective correction covering such a long period.

5.

The appeal accordingly fails and is dismissed. No costs.