High CourtsSingle Bench(1996) 09 MP CK 0021

Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. vs Keshavdas Agrawal

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 27 September 1996 · Citation: (1997) 2 MPJR 301

HON’BLE JUDGES
A.S. Tripathi, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
M.A. No. 19/92 (G)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 563 words

A.S. Tripathi, J.

This appeal has been preferred against the order dated 20.9.1991 passed by the IV the A.D.J. Gwalior whereby the issue on the point of jurisdiction was decided in favour of the respondent that the Civil Court, Gwalior had jurisdiction to decide the dispute.

The plaintiff-respondent had filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 23,005.70 p with interest at the rate of 1 18% per annum at the price of uniforms and clothes supplied by the plaintiff.

There was a contract between the parties that the plaintiff-respondent would supply certain lab-coals of different descriptions to the defendants employees who were large in number and the plaintiff claimed to have supplied as per the orders. The copies of orders placed arc on record. The supply receipts are also placed on record.

A preliminary objection was raised on behalf filed. Further, in the purchase order itself certain conditions are mentioned. Item 21 is in respect of jurisdiction which is in the following words:

21.

Jurisdiction - All questions, disputes or differences arising under, out of or in connection with contract shall be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the court within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the place from which the acceptance of the tender is issued is situated.

The arbitration clause as referred above was for general tenders of works to be done in the factory in the present case for the purchase and sale of certain articles. Different conditions were put on the back of the purchase order and on the point of jurisdiction it is conferred to the local Court. Therefore, the general arbitration clause did not apply to the facts of the present case. The only dispute was for non-payment of certain amounts of some items supplied by the plaintiff. This was the dispute which is covered under clause 21 of the agreement. It has no relation to the general, arbitration clause of the Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited, Bhopal. In this view of the matter, the trial Court had rightly held that the civil Court at Gwalior had jurisdiction to try the suit which was very simple in nature for recovery of some amount for the supply of lab-coats.

A reference was also made to the case of State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Mohd. Ashrafuddin, . In that case, the Supreme Court had said that normally if there is an arbitration agreement between the parties and any clause arbitration agreement is not illegal, the matter be referred to the Arbitrator and the proceedings of the suit have to be stayed. But the facts of the present case are different. There is no arbitration clause in the purchase order which is the only agreement between the parties. The general arbitration clause of Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited, Bhopal was in respect of the matters mentioned in the clause itself like designs, drawings, specifications, estimates, etc. In the present case, the only dispute was in respect of non-payment of certain clothes already supplied. Therefore, the general arbitration clause could not apply to the facts of the case. The trial court had rightly held that the civil Court. Gwalior had jurisdiction to try the suit.

There is no merit in the appeal. It is dismissed accordingly with costs. The record of the lower Court be sent back to the trial Court for proceeding with the trial of the suit according to law.