High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 06 CAL CK 0070

Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited - Electronics Division vs West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Limited And Anr

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 21 June 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Moushumi Bhattacharya, J
CASE NUMBER
Arbitration Petition No. 242, 243, 244 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 357 words

This is an application under Section 9 of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by the petitioner, contractor for the commissioning of a Solar

Power Plant for the respondent State Electricity Board who prays for an order of injunction restraining the respondent no.1 from making any claim for

payment under the performance guarantee in terms of the Letter of Invocation dated 24th May, 2021.

Learned senior counsel for the petitioner raises several factual issues for persuading the Court to grant the prayer for restraining invocation of the

performance guarantee but primarily on the factual question on whether the letter of invocation was according to the terms of performance guarantee.

Counsel cites Hindustan Construction vs. State of Bihar : 1999 8 SCC 436 in this context. It is also submitted that the respondent no.1 could not

terminate the Letter of Award since the petitioner had completed the work and none of the three conditions for terminating the LOA existed as on the

date of termination of the LOA.

Learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent no.1 takes a point of suppression in the filing of the application particularly with regard to the

LOA which has been annexed to the application. Counsel further submits that subsequent to the Letter of Invocation dated 24th May, 2021, the

respondent no.1 has issued a letter dated 9th June, 2021 to the petitioner expressing the loss and damage caused by the non-completion of the project

as justification for the termination of the LOA. It is further submitted that there are several letters exchanged between the petitioner and the first

respondent which have not been made part of the application.

Upon hearing learned counsel, since it is evident, prima facie, that there are indeed several documents which the Court must consider before allowing

or rejecting application, let such documents be brought on record by way of affidavit within seven (7) days from date ; reply thereto within a week

thereafter.

List this matter after a fortnight.

Until the matter is heard on affidavits, the respondents will not proceed pursuant to the letter dated 24th May, 2021 or until further orders whichever is

earlier.