High CourtsSingle Bench(2022) 02 OHC CK 0096

Bhakta Ranjan Pattnaik vs New India Assurance Company Ltd. And Others

Orissa High Court · Decided on 11 February 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Arindam Sinha, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 32952 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 178 words

Arindam Sinha, J

I.A. no.18139 of 2021

1.

Mr. Khan, learned advocate appears on behalf of review applicants. Mr. Mishra, learned advocate appears on behalf of opposite party-writ

petitioner. He draws attention to order dated 5th January, 2022, in which Court directed review applicants, for purpose of adjudication of the review

application, they must come ready with their defence case in the writ petition.

2.Mr. Khan submits, the disposal order was passed ex parte against his clients. His clients had sought clarification because there exists confusion.

3.

Court by order dated 26th November, 2021, on reasons expressed, said it was convinced petitioner is entitled to the claim. Review applicants have

peremptory adjournment to demonstrate that in addition to the licence and permit, petitioner possesses, a special licence for carrying petroleum

products was required by law. Mr. Khan submits, adjournment is not necessary since the only grievance of his clients was that the order was passed

ex parte. His clients have now been given hearing.

4.

No order is made on the review application. It is disposed of.

................................