High CourtsDivision Bench(1914) 06 CAL CK 0012

Bhakta Mahto vs Thakur Udit Narain Singh Deo

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 5 June 1914 · Citation: 25 Ind. Cas. 899

HON’BLE JUDGES
Stephen, J · Mullick, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 150 words
1.

This is a suit decided in appeal by the Judicial Commissioner of Chota Nagpur in which he remands the case tried by the Deputy Collector of Singbhum. The order of remand comes before us on appeal. But as it appears that none of the provisions of the CPC has been incorporated, as they might have been, in the Chota Nagpur Tenancy Act, we hold that this appeal is incompetent. An application has been made to us that we should now interfere in revision on the ground that this remand has been made without jurisdiction. We are, however, in this difficulty that we cannot consider the correctness of the law laid down by the Judicial Commissioner, and putting that on one side we cannot interfere with the order of remand.

2.

The result is that this appeal is dismissed with costs, the hearing fee being assessed at one gold mohur.