High CourtsSingle Bench(2022) 06 OHC CK 0108

Bhagyadhar Dash vs PKP Buildcon Pvt. Ltd

Orissa High Court · Decided on 24 June 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dr. S. Muralidhar, CJ
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
ARBP No. 6 Of 2019

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 246 words

Dr. S. Muralidhar, J

1.

A report has been received from the Examiner of Questioned Documents, CID, Crime Branch, Orissa, Rasulgarh, Bhubaneswar rendering the opinion that the disputed signatures (X-1 to X-7) are forged signatures and had been produced by some electronic process.

2.

Copy of the entire report be made available to learned counsel for the Petitioner as well as the Opposite Party by the Registry within two days. The report be kept back in a sealed cover with the Registry.

3.

In the view of the above report, the present application is dismissed with costs of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) which shall be paid by the Petitioner to the Opposite Party within four weeks.

4.

In view of the seriousness of the misconduct of the Petitioner in placing before the Court a forged document on the basis of which relief has been sought, the Registrar General of this Court is directed to draw up a case for initiation of proceedings against the Petitioner under Section 340 Cr PC and forward it to the jurisdictional magistrate enclosing a copy of the report of the SFSL which shall form the prima facie material for such proceedings.

5.

A copy of this order be sent to the Registrar General forthwith. For the purposes of drawing up the case and forwarding it to the Magistrate along with a copy of the report of the SFSL, the sealed cover be opened by the Registrar General and re-sealed thereafter.

…………………………….