High CourtsSingle Bench(2020) 12 SHI CK 0077

Bhagat Ram And Others vs State Of H.P.

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 16 December 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vivek Singh Thakur, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No.1928, 1930 Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

41 paragraphs · 751 words

Vivek Singh Thakur, J

1.

Both these petitions have been preferred, seeking bail in case FIR No. 117 of 2020, registered under Sections 20, 61 and 85 of Narcotic Drugs and

Psychotropic Substances Act in Police Station, Padhar, District Mandi, H.P.

2.

Status report stands filed, wherein it is stated that the petitioners have joined the investigation and nothing is to be recovered from them. As per

status report, on the basis of complaint received from the Patwari, police had visited village Tikkar for investigation and has found that in the village in

Khasra Nos. 463, 450, 451, 443, 448, along-with crop of maze sown in the fields, illegal cultivation of cannabis was also there. From the spot about

more than 5000 plants of cannabis were uprooted and after retaining samples of 14 plants, other plants were destroyed.

3.

It is also stated in the status report that aforesaid Khasra numbers are in joint ownership of Shakt Ram, Dasham Ram, Karam Singh, Ram Lal,

Shyam Lal, Kanya Kumari, Prakash Chand, Dev Kali, Bhima Kali, Bhiyandi, Mede Ram, Lekh Ram, Bhagat Ram, Soma Pati, Chunki Devi.

4.

It is claimed by the petitioners that during interrogation and on the basis of statement made by the co-owners, land comprised in Khasra Nos. 463,

450, 451 and 443 has been alloted to petitioner Bhagat Ram whereas land comprised in Khasra No. 448 has been alloted to Lekh Ram.

5.

According to the status report, investigation in the case is complete and challan is likely to be presented in the Court very soon. Neither there is

prayer for custodial interrogation of the petitioners nor any case is made out for the same.

6.

Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, petitioners are ordered to be enlarged on bail in present case subject to furnishing

personal bond in the sum of `50,000/- each with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court within two weeks from

today and also subject to the following conditions:-

i) That the petitioners shall make themselves available to the police or any other Investigating Agency or Court in the present case as and when

required;

ii) that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as

to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to Court or to any Police Officer or tamper with the evidence. They shall not, in any manner, try to

overawe or influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses;

iii) that they shall not obstruct the smooth progress of the investigation/trial;

iv) that the petitioners shall not misuse their liberty in any manner;

v) that the petitioners shall not jump over the bail;

vi) that they shall keep on informing about the change in address, landline number and/or mobile number, if any, for their availability to Police and/or

during trial; and

vii) they shall not leave India without permission of the Court.

viii) that the petitioners shall not commit the offence similar to the offence to which they are accused or suspected;

ix) In case petitioners are again found to have involved in commission of similar offence or any other offence related to NDPS Act, in such

eventuality, their bail in the present case shall be liable to be cancelled, on taking appropriate steps by the prosecution.

7.

It will be open to the prosecution to apply for imposing and/or to the trial Court to impose any other condition on the petitioners as deemed

necessary in the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice.

8.

In case the petitioners violate any conditions imposed upon them, their bail shall be liable to be cancelled. In such eventuality prosecution may

approach the competent Court of law for cancellation of bail, in accordance with law.

9.

Learned trial Court is directed to comply with the directions issued by the High Court, vide communication No. HHC.VIG./Misc. Instructions/93-

IV.7139 dated 18.03.2013.

10.

Observations made in these petitions hereinbefore shall not affect the merits of the case in any manner and are strictly confined for the disposal of

the bail applications.

11.

The petitioners are permitted to produce copy of order downloaded from the High Court website and the trial Court shall not insist for certified

copy of the order, however, they may verify the order from the High Court website or otherwise.

12.

The petitions stand disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Dasti Copy.