High Courts(1939) 11 CAL CK 0002

Bhabagobinda Choudhuri vs Bholanath Basak and Others

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 28 November 1939 · Citation: AIR 1940 Cal 112

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 115 words
1.

The learned Advocate for the petitioner does not want to proceed against minor opposite parties Nos. 4 and 6. The Rule therefore stands discharged against the said minor opposite parties and proceeds against the remaining opposite parties at the petitioners'' risk. The question as to what is the amount of a debt of a particular debtor is to be decided by the Board under Rule 145, Bengal Agricultural Debtors Rules. The Civil Court therefore has no jurisdiction to go into this question. We accordingly modify the order of the learned Subordinate Judge to this extent that the execution proceedings will be stayed against the petitioner only. There will be no order as to costs.