High CourtsSingle Bench(2010) 06 KL CK 0027

Bency vs Preceline George

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 4 June 2010 · Citation: (2010) 2 ILR (Ker) 880 : (2010) 2 KLJ 993 : (2010) 2 KLJ 398 : (2011) 6 RCR(Criminal) 2647

HON’BLE JUDGES
V. Ramkumar, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal M.C. No. 1671 of 2010

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 393 words

V. Ramkumar, J.—Petitioner is the wife of the first respondent. Their marriage was solemnized on 7.6.2009. Thereafter the marital partners fell apart. The wife now seeks a direction to the fourth respondent, Sub Inspector of Police, Thrikkakara Police Station to investigate Annexure – A1 complaint registered as Crime No. 639/2010 for an offence punishable u/s 498A read with Section 34 I.P.C. and a direction restraining the fifth respondent, Sub Inspector of Police, Mannarcaud from conducting any investigation consequent on the transfer of the F.I.R by the Thrikkakara Police to the Mannarcaud Police.

2.

Annexure – A1 complaint filed by the petitioner before the J.F.C.M Court-I, Aluva was forwarded by the Magistrate to the Thrikkakara police u/s 156(3) Cr.P.C. The Thrikkakara police registered a case as Crime No. 639/2010 for an offence punishable u/s 498A read with Section 34 I.P.C. On 9.4.2010 the learned Magistrate received from the Thrikkakara police the F.I.R along with Annexure – A1 complaint. Thereafter on 22.4.2010 the Sub Inspector of police, Thrikkakara submitted a report before the Aluva Magistrate stating that since the occurrence took place within the limits of the Mannarcaud Police Station the case diary has been transferred to the Mannarcaud Police and requested the Magistrate to forward the F.I.R and the complaint to the Mannarcaud Police Station.

3.

Apart from the fact that going by the allegations in Annexure A1 complaint, part of the occurrence took place within the local limits of the Thrikkakara Police Station and therefore it was perfectly legal for the Thrikkakara Police to conduct the investigation Vide Biju Purushothaman v. State of Kerala 2008 (3) KLT 85, in the light of the decision reported in Rasiklal Dalpatram Thakkar Vs. State of Gujarat and Others, it was not permissible for the Thrikkakara Police to transfer the F.I.R to another Police Station for the reason that the Thrikkakara Police to which the complaint was forwarded u/s 156(3) Cr.P.C. has no territorial jurisdiction to investigate the offence.

4.

This Criminal M.C is accordingly allowed directing the fifth respondent, Sub Inspector of Police, Mannarcaud to re-transfer the records in Crime No. 327/2010 of that police station to Thrikkakara Police Station. The fourth respondent, Sub Inspector of Police, Thrikkakara is directed to thereafter complete the investigation in Crime No. 639/2010 as originally filed and file a final report before the J.F.C.M Court-I, Aluva without any more delay.