High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 05 CHH CK 0129

Belku Ram Mourya vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 15 May 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
P. Sam Koshy, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case (MCRC) No. 1936 Of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 328 words

P. Sam Koshy, J

1.

This is the first bail application seeking for grant of bail to the Applicant who is in jail since 10.06.2017 in connection with Crime No.64 of 2017 registered at Police Station Darbha, Distt. Bastar, for the offence punishable under Sections 366 and 376 IPC.

2.

The allegation against the applicant is that, the applicant on the pretext of marriage is said to have abducted the prosecutrix and had physical relationship with her for a considerable period and in the course she got conceived and also gave birth of child from the relationship which the prosecutrix had with the applicant. Thereafter, the applicant is said to have refused to marry the prosecutrix which ultimately led to filing of complaint.

3.

Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the statement of prosecutrix under Section 164 CrPC itself would reveal that the prosecutrix had voluntarily gone with the applicant and had physical relationship with him and there was no coercion or pressure applied by the applicant at any point of time. The prosecutrix was a major lady and she has not raised any objection in having physical relationship with the applicant, and therefore he may be released on bail.

4.

The State counsel opposing the application submits that it is a case where the applicant on the pretext of marriage is said to have exploited the prosecutrix for a very long time and had physical relationship with her. As a result of said relationship, the prosecutrix got conceived and also delivered a child, yet the applicant refused to marry the prosecutrix and fled away from the village. Thus, prayed for rejection of the bail application.

5.

Without commenting on merits, considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and the conduct of the applicant, this Court is of the opinion that the present is not a fit case where the Applicant can be enlarged on bail.

6.

Accordingly, the bail application stands rejected.