High CourtsDivision Bench(1883) 09 CAL CK 0005

Beer Chunder Manikya vs Ishan Chunder Burdhun and Others

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 10 September 1883 · Citation: (1884) ILR (Cal) 136

HON’BLE JUDGES
Tottenham, J · McDonell, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 119 words

McDonell, J.—We think that the Court below is wrong in holding that Section 432 of the CPC prevents the institution of a suit by the Maharajah in his own name, and through a recognized agent other than one appointed under that section. In the present suit the Maharajah has not sued as the independent Rajah of Hill Tipperah, but as Zamindar of Chakla Roshanabad, etc. The judgment to which the Subordinate Judge refers was a suit which was brought against the Maharajah qua Maharajah of Independent Tipperah, in respect of a subject of which our Courts could not take cognizance. The order of the lower Court is therefore reversed, and the suit will be tried by the Subordinate Judge.