Supreme CourtDivision Bench(2012) 07 SC CK 0094

Bar Council of India vs A.K. Balaji and Others

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 4 July 2012 · Citation: (2012) 3 CompLJ 302

HON’BLE JUDGES
R.M. Lodha, J · Anil R. Dave, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No''s. 17150-17154 of 2012

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 190 words
1.

Issue notice returnable in ten weeks.

2.

M/s. Dua Associates waive service for common Respondent Nos. 14 and 33, Mr. E.C. Agrawala, Advocate, waives service for common Respondent Nos. 10, 16, 19, 26, 39 and 40, and Mr. Sakya Singha Chaudhari, Advocate, waives service for common Respondent No. 18 in the special leave petitions.

3.

Notice shall only go to the unrepresented Respondents.

4.

Dasti, in addition to the ordinary process, is permitted.

5.

In the meanwhile, it is clarified that Reserve Bank of India shall not grant any permission to the foreign law firms to open liaison offices in India u/s 29 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973. It is also clarified that the expression "to practice the profession of law" u/s 29 of the Advocates Act, 1961 covers the persons practicing litigious matters as well as non-litigious matters other than contemplated in para 63(ii) of the impugned order and, therefore, to practice in non-litigious matters in India the foreign law firms, by SLP (Civil) No(s). 17150 - 17154/2012 whatever name called or described, shall be bound to follow the provisions contained in the Advocates Act, 1961.