High CourtsSingle Bench(1912) 08 MAD CK 0087

Balusu Lakshmayya and Others vs Emperor

Madras High Court · Decided on 22 August 1912 · Citation: 16 Ind. Cas. 520

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ayling, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 126 words

Ayling, J.—The judgment of the Deputy Magistrate does not comply with the requirements of Section 367, Criminal Procedure Code. There is a long recital of the facts preceding the alleged offence, but no discussion of the evidence or anything to indicate that the Magistrate has considered such essential points as the ownership of the grain, the possibility of accused having acted in good faith, or the evidence implicating individual accused persons. The order of the Deputy Magistrate confirming the convictions and sentences is set aside; and he is directed to re-hear the appeal and dispose of it according to law. The accused, who has been admitted to bail by this Court, will remain on the same bail pending disposal of the appeal by the Deputy Magistrate.