High Courts(2012) 02 P&H CK 0188

Balbir and another vs State of Haryana and others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 6 February 2012 · Citation: (2012) 2 RCR(Criminal) 612

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rakesh Kumar Garg, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-28209 of 2010 (O&M)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 158 words

Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.

Application is allowed and the main petition is taken on board.

Admittedly, the petitioners have been convicted by the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Hisar for offences under Sections 285/506/34 IPC and 25 Arms Act, vide judgment dated 23.9.2009 and have been ordered to undergo various sentences in the aforesaid offences, the maximum being rigorous imprisonment for one year. Appeal against the aforesaid judgment is pending before the Appellate Authority.

This petition has been filed to quash the aforesaid judgment of the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class on the ground that a compromise has been effected between the parties.

After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners wishes to withdraw the present petition with liberty to move an application before the Appellate Authority for redressal of their grievances.

This petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to seek any remedy which is available to them before the Appellate Authority, in accordance with law.