High CourtsSingle Bench(2024) 01 MAD CK 0085

Balaraman S/O. Rajappan vs State

Madras High Court · Decided on 10 January 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
C.V.Karthikeyan, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Original Petition No. 432 Of 2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

16 paragraphs · 525 words

C.V.Karthikeyan, J

1.

The petitioner seeks bail in Crime No.370 of 2023, registered by the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 379 of IPC r/w 21(1) of Mines & Minerals (Development & Regulation Act), 1957. The petitioner had been arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 24.12.2023.

2.

The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner is alleged to have transported ¼ unit of Norambu Sand in a Tractor. Hence the complaint.

3.

The learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further stated that the petitioner is ready to abide by any condition imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the petitioner.

4.

The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent stated that the petitioner has illegally transported ¼ unit of Norambu sand in a Tractor. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.

5.

In order to curb illegal sand mining activities, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.7,500/-(Rupees Seven Thousand Five Hundred only) as non refundable deposit to the credit of the District Revenue Officer, Tirupattur District, without prejudice to his rights and contentions before the trial Court.

6.

Merely, because the petitioner deposits the said amount, it would not amount to admission of his guilt. Therefore, it is open to the trial Court to deal with the case independently.

7.

Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances and the submissions made by the learned counsels, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions:

8.

Accordingly, the petitioner shall make a non-refundable deposit of Rs.7,500/- (Rupees Seven Thousand Five Hundred only) to the credit of the District Revenue Officer, Tirupattur District, and on such deposit and production of proof, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrat, Ambur, Tirupattur District, and on further conditions that :-

[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial

Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.