Supreme CourtDivision Bench(2009) 01 SC CK 0029

Bala vs NCT of Delhi and Others

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 23 January 2009

HON’BLE JUDGES
Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J · B. Sudershan Reddy, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Appeal No. 146 of 2009 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Criminal) No. 905 of 2007)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 294 words
1.

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

2.

Delay condoned.

3.

Leave granted.

4.

This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 20.10.2005 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Criminal Writ Petition No. 1332 of 2003 whereby the High Court dismissed the said writ petition.

5.

This appeal has been filed by Smt. Bala, mother of Dinesh who died on 25.7.2003 while he was studying in 8th Class in Sarvodaya Vidyalaya, Bakner, New Delhi (respondent No. 2 herein). She filed the writ petition before the High Court seeking adequate compensation for the negligence of the school authorities. The learned Single Judge of the High Court dismissed the writ petition by slipshod order without assigning any reason. Against the said order, the appellant has approached this Court.

6.

The order impugned in this appeal is wholly untenable and unsustainable and is, therefore, set aside. We are of the view that instead of remitting the case back to the High Court for deciding the writ petition afresh on its merits, justice would be subserved by directing the appellant to send a detailed representation to the Chief Secretary of the NCT of Delhi with copies thereof to the Director of Education, NCT and the Principal, Sarvodaya Vidyalaya, Bakner, New Delhi for seeking legitimate and appropriate reliefs. The needful shall be done by the appellant within two weeks from today. The representation if made shall be sympathetically considered on its merits by the competent authorities within four weeks from the date of receipt of the same, and decision made thereon shall be duly communicated to the appellant.

7.

The impugned judgment and order dated 20.10.2005 accordingly is set aside.

8.

The appeal is allowed in the aforesaid terms.