High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 03 JH CK 0068

Baiju Bhuia, son of late Sukar Bhuia vs The State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand High Court · Decided on 22 March 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Aparesh Kumar Singh
RESULT
Disposed
CASE NUMBER
1619 of 2017

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

33 paragraphs · 395 words
1.

Heard counsel for the petitioner, State and Respondent JAC.

2.

Three guardians of three such children have approached this Court in the

present writ application, seeking permission to appear in Class-IX Pre-Board Exam

to be held on 23.03.2017 by the Jharkhand Academic Council.

3.

The school in question Prastawit Ucha Vidyalaya, Bilingbira Gumla has been

de-recognized on 18.01.2017. The school itself approached this Court in WPC No.

1220/2017. By order dated 17.03.2017, the writ petition was disposed of with a

direction that the representatives of the Institution should appear with their

explanation before the Jharkhand Academic Council on 21.03.2017. The Jharkhand

Academic Council was directed to take a decision on their explanation in the matter

of de-recognition, within a period of one week thereafter. The time stipulated has not

yet elapsed. De-recognition as such, has not yet been annulled till date.

4.

Present writ petition does not contain any averment as to the facts relating to

the conduct of courses in previous Academic Calender, infrastructural and faculty-

wise details; whether classes were conducted on regular basis and students have

attended the minimum number of classes, etc. In the absence of relevant details and

backgrounds facts, petitioners do not make out a case for issuing a direction for

allowing the students of that Institution to appear in the pre-Board Class-IX Exam

simply on the ground that registration forms and fees, etc. were accepted.

5.

Learned counsel for the Respondent Jharkhand Academic Council submits

that in case, if the question of de-recognition is reconsidered and their explanation is

accepted, students in question who have completed the course, attended the

minimum number of classes and fulfill other eligibility criteria and conditions, can

be allowed to sit in any exams to be held thereafter.

6.

On account of the reasons discussed herein-above, this Court is not satisfied

that indulgence can be granted in the matter on misplaced sympathies, which may

have a bearing on the future career of innocent students itself. Dependant on the

decision to be taken on the issue of de-recognition and in case Jharkhand Academic

Council finds that the students in question are innocent victims of the lapses on the

part of the Institution, it may consider completing their courses from any other

Institution, in accordance with law.

7.

With the aforesaid observations, this writ petition is disposed of, however

without interfering in the matter.