High CourtsFull Bench(1913) 01 CAL CK 0052

Baij Nath Goenka vs Mohant Sia Ram Das

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 14 January 1913 · Citation: 18 Ind. Cas. 900

HON’BLE JUDGES
Lawrence Jenkins, C.J · Stephen, J · Richard Harington, J · Holmwood, J · Asutosh Mookerjee, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 91 words
1.

It is conceded and is obvious that the attachment was not by a mortgagee, that is to say, when the attachment was made there was no mortgagee in existence as such. That being so, Section 99 of the Transfer of Property Act has no application, and the sale can be carried out in execution proceedings consequent on that attachment. With these observations, the case is sent back to the Division Bench for disposal.

2.

The costs of this reference will be costs in the appeal; hearing fee, three gold mohurs.